DutyLedger

Wellbeing, aggregate only

Everything on this page is a cohort aggregate. Cells backed by fewer than five responses (ten for sensitive slices) are suppressed with a marker, never shown as zero, and complementary suppression prevents differencing. No role, including this view, can reach an individual response.

How the assessment works

  1. Consent-gated check-in. Workers answer the pulse and the 35-statement HSE questionnaire at Wellbeing check-in, pseudonymously; participation is opt-in and consent-scoped.
  2. Instrument scoring. Each answer is scored against the validated factor model (reverse-worded items flip so higher is always better).
  3. Release gate. Scores aggregate per cohort per period only when the cohort reaches five respondents; complementary suppression hides the neighbours too.
  4. Factor profile and bands. Released scores render below as the seven-factor profile with red / amber / green bands (HSE benchmark thresholds).
  5. Duty actions. A red crossing raises exactly one corrective action per cohort and factor, bound to that factor's evidence-based action template and addressed to the accountable officer; amber records an officer review; the audit chain records every decision.
  6. Deflection watch. The Due Diligence register carries the deflection index: suppression streaks, post-trigger response decline, evidence-less closures and re-trigger recidivism, per unit per quarter.

Executive summary unavailable

The aggregate-only service did not answer. This view shows cohorts only when the suppression gate allows it, so it stays empty rather than estimating.

Reload

Factor profile (HSE-MS-35) unavailable

The aggregate-only service did not answer. This view shows cohorts only when the suppression gate allows it, so it stays empty rather than estimating.

Reload

Cohort wellbeing pulse unavailable

The aggregate-only service did not answer. This view shows cohorts only when the suppression gate allows it, so it stays empty rather than estimating.

Reload

Psychosocial hazard register (SWA taxonomy)

Live control and assessment counts are unavailable right now; the taxonomy below is the reference set and stays accurate as a structure.

  • SWA-1Workload and work paceSustained high demands, unrealistic deadlines, understaffing.Controls linked: 0 | Open assessments: 0
  • SWA-2Low job controlLittle say over how or when work is done.Controls linked: 0 | Open assessments: 0
  • SWA-3Poor supportInadequate task, emotional or organisational support.Controls linked: 0 | Open assessments: 0
  • SWA-4Lack of role clarityUncertain expectations, conflicting demands, overlapping accountabilities.Controls linked: 0 | Open assessments: 0
  • SWA-5Poor change managementChange imposed without consultation, information or transition support.Controls linked: 0 | Open assessments: 0
  • SWA-6Inadequate reward and recognitionEffort not matched by recognition, real or perceived inequity.Controls linked: 0 | Open assessments: 0
  • SWA-7Poor organisational justiceUnfair processes, favouritism, inconsistent application of rules.Controls linked: 0 | Open assessments: 0
  • SWA-8Remote and isolated workWork without ready access to colleagues or support.Controls linked: 0 | Open assessments: 0
  • SWA-9Violent or traumatic content or eventsExposure to abuse, threats, distressing material or incidents.Controls linked: 0 | Open assessments: 0
  • SWA-10Interpersonal conflict and poor workplace relationshipsBullying, harassment, incivility, ongoing conflict.Controls linked: 0 | Open assessments: 0

Wellbeing capture is opt-in with documented consent (HRIP Act 1998 NSW, health records). There is no manager override and no default yes.

Duty trigger log unavailable

The event log did not answer. When a gated cohort rating crosses its threshold, the corrective action and audit anchor appear here, as an event, never as a person.

Reload